|
Symbolic boundaries are a theory of how people form social groups proposed by cultural sociologists. Symbolic boundaries are “conceptual distinctions made by social actors…that separate people into groups and generate feelings of similarity and group membership.”〔Lamont, Michele and Virag Molnar. 2002. "The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences" Annual Review of Sociology. 28:167-95〕 Symbolic boundaries are a “necessary but insufficient” condition for social change. “Only when symbolic boundaries are widely agreed upon can they take on a constraining character… and become social boundaries.”〔 ==Durkheim== Durkheim saw the symbolic boundary between sacred and profane as the most profound of all social facts, and the one from which lesser symbolic boundaries were derived.〔Emile Durkheim, ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life'' (1971()) p. 38〕 Rituals - secular or religious - were for Durkheim the means by which groups maintained their symbolic/moral boundaries.〔Kenneth Allen, ''Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory'' (2009) p. 120〕 Mary Douglas has subsequently emphasised the role of symbolic boundaries in organising experience, private and public, even in a secular society;〔Mary Douglas, ''Natural Symbols'' (2002) p. 50-1〕 while other neo-Durkheimians highlight the role of deviancy as one of revealing and making plain the symbolic boundaries that uphold moral order, and of providing an opportunity for their communal reinforcement.〔Annalee R. Ward, '' Mouse Morality'' (2002) p. 38〕 As Durkheim himself put it, "Crime brings together upright consciences and concentrates them...to talk of the event and wax indignant in common",〔Quoted in Peter Worsley ed., ''The New Modern Sociology Readings'' (1991) p. 480〕 thereby reaffirming the collective barriers that have been breached. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Symbolic boundaries」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|